About Me

Name: John Crutchfield
Email: p.crutchfield@comcast.net Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Wally-War

By now everyone must have heard of the worker who was trampled to death by a mob of shoppers who stormed the entrance to a Long Island Wal-Mart as the doors opened on Black Friday.  There has since been much commentary on whether or not Wal-Mart was liable for the injuries the worker and customers sustained in the incident.
 
One caller to a local radio talk show I listen to was an attorney.  He explained how any business, inviting customers to their location to engage in activity from which it benefits, assumes the responsibility for the customer's safety.  Ths is an old law based on principles that arrived here with our earliest settlers according to the legal scholar.  Without a doubt, businesses are responsible for the safety of their workers.
 
Another caller claimed that Wal-Mart wasn't guilty of any wrongdoing and wanted to know what ever happened to personal responsibility?  That would have been fine, if he'd stopped right there, but he went on to say:  "Wal-Mart is guilty of putting the little guy out of business, but they aren't guilty in this case."  "Putting the little guy out of business" has become the buzz phrase among Wal-Mart haters everywhere, but let's face facts.  They didn't do it alone.
 
When it comes to competition, Wal-Mart is guilty of nothing more than offering consumers an alternative shopping experience within a free market economy.  For this, Wally World has become a villian in the eyes of those blinded by resentment.
 
Wal-Mart offers consumers a choice.  They can buy something for thirty dollars that might cost fifty at some mom and pop store.  American consumers are smart enough to understand that it makes no sense to pay more for the same or similar goods and wisely choose the thriftier option.  If the caller and the multitudes of like minded, principled consumers are so concerned about mom and pop, they certainly can pony up the extra $20 and shop there.  But they don't.  That's the dirty little secret.  Ultimately, the consumer is responsible for mom amd pop's demise by choosing to shop the competition.
 
No doubt, many of those making the most noise about how unfair it is for Wal-Mart to dominate the marketplace are the first to storm the front door in search of a bargain.  Wal-Mart is responsible for underestimating the danger posed by an ill tempered  mob driven by unchecked greed.  That greed cost Jdimytai Damour his life.  There is no excuse for that and there's plenty of guilt to go around.  Wal-Mart and consumers alike share the burden of responsibility for this tragedy.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ramos & Campean

Mr. President,
Please pardon Ramos and Campean.  True, they may have shot a drug smuggler, but they may have saved some innocent lives in the process.
Respectfully,
John Crutchfield
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

God, Grace and Grandchildren

Last spring, a little girl signed up for the town softball league.  I'll call her Mary.  She was only seven and a tad small compared to the rest of the girls on the team, but she proved herself rather quickly, batting and fielding balls like she'd done it all her life.  Mary's family loved to go to the games and watch her play and establish relationships with her team mates.
 
Mary's mom and dad had inflexible work schedules and the duty of getting her to practice on Tuesdays fell on her grandfather. It was a job he cherished.  It meant he got to spend a little more time one on one with this child he loves so much.  Before practice, they'd go to her favorite restaurant where granddad would buy her a Happy Meal.  Grandpa didn't get anything, knowing his loving wife would have dinner ready when he got home. 
 
Now, Mary's grandfather adored all his grandchildren and would give them the world, if he could.  Certainly, there was nothing he wouldn't do for them and he often referred to them as "the reason he lived".  They truly add a special meaning to his life that goes beyond words.
 
One Tuesday, Mary and her granddad were sitting at this restaurant and they were talking as granddad watched Mary eat.  Those fries looked good, he thought, and let his fingers do the walking across the wrapper in an attempt to grab one.  Mary saw it coming and with a playfully defiant grin, wrapped her arms around her treasure.  No sir, she wasn't going to share, not even with her grandfather.  After a brief struggle, granddad came away with a golden french fry, but the moment revealed a special meaning and he was struck by the metaphor he had just witnessed.  In Mary's mind, those fries were hers, never stopping to realize that she wouldn't have had them if her grandfather hadn't bought them for her in the first place.
 
Isn't that how many of us treat God?  We cling to our earthly treasures and deny Him a portion of what is rightfully His.  Far too often we take for granted the blessings we receive and fail to give thanks to the one who provides them.
 
Lord, thank you for all you have given us and continue to give by your grace.  Would you like some fries?
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We Had a Dream Too

A long time ago, a young guy decided it was time to set out in his own business.  Joe had developed enough skill, he figured, working part time in his field of endeavor to give it a go.  And so, he set out to make a name for himself and over the next few years, the business grew quite steadily to the point where he felt the need to hire someone to help share the load.
 
Soon, Joe thought it was time to open a shop where he could ply his craft and provide better service to his customers.  After some searching, he found a good location and laid out the triple net fees the landlord required.  He paid the necessary insurance, the water and the heating bills and endless miscellaneous business related expenses including building some inventory and tooling up the new facility.
 
As the business continued to grow, it was necessary to bring on some extra help, so Joe hired another man and then a couple of part time people a little later.  Business was booming and everyone was happy as could be.
 
With everything going his way, Joe decided six years of paying rent was enough and purchased some land where he and his wife, Nancy could build a solid business to provide for their financial security and to leave something for their children.  The building was great. It was carefully designed and very well thought out and Joe was the envy of all his peers.  Ahhh, life was good..........too good.
 
Without warning, only a month after moving to the new location, their biggest client closed it's doors after one hundred years in business.  The following year their second biggest customer closed after forty eight years in business.  The economy was in decline and work was drying up.  Joe found he couldn't plug the leaks fast enough and his ship of dreams was sinking fast.
 
He tried to hang on to his people, but there was no way.  Eventually they all moved on to greener pastures.  Thank God they could.  Joe wasn't so lucky.  He had leveraged his house against the business loan and with every passing day, found himself a little deeper in debt and no relief in sight.  His business was dying, his credit was junk and the marriage was suffering terribly. The situation seemed hopeless.  It was a dark time the couple would just as soon forget.
 
For the better part of six long years Joe fought to keep his dream alive, but in the end, he had nothing left to give in this losing battle.  The couple had used up all their savings, cashed in their life insurance policies and ate up all the equity in their home trying to keep the business going.  Credit cards were piling up and suppliers threatened to shut them off.  The commercial property had lost close to half it's value and the bank moved to foreclose.  Filing for bankruptcy was the only way Nancy and Joe could save their house.
 
When it was all said and done, the couple had lost over two hundred thousand dollars.  They could have run around blaming every Tom, Dick and Harry, but the truth is they were victims of their own ignorance. 
 
They had made a critical error so common to budding entrepaneurs and corporate CEOs alike.  They had failed to plan for the worst case scenario and when it happened, they were unprepared for the ensuing beating.  But unlike the CEO, the entrepaneur risks his own money and sweat equity.  Failure, for him, is personal. 
 
Nancy and Joe have had to revise their goals downward from building a business to just paying bills from week to week.  Still paying off lingering debt fifteen years later and with all that's going on nationally, they are wondering how they will ever be able to retire.
 
Joe and Nancy's story is only one among millions of hard working people who took a chance and paid dearly.  For most of them, it isn't over yet.  Like Joe and Nancy, they're watching their home values drop with the housing market and their 401Ks are tanking with the stock market.  Their nest eggs are being plundered by a faceless pillager against which there seems to be no defense. 
 
These are the folks who want to know why their government thinks it has to use our money to insulate the UAW from the realities of life and the financial difficulties the rest of us have to suffer through.  Surely you won't be surprised to learn we don't endorse $700 billion bailout packages for mismanaged corporations and schemes of spreading the wealth around.  Those solutions only reward failure and encourage more of the same.
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

USSA

Back in the late nineteen fifties, a mother attempted to explain how precious our freedom is and how blessed we are to enjoy the right of free speech.  To help illustrate her point, she described a little bit about what life was like under communism.  She told of the basic characteristics of communism and added in a little bit of something her son found nearly unbelieveable.  She described how children raised in communism were taught to be loyal to the state exclusively.  They were taught to hold the state in higher regard than anything else, even their families.
 
We can discuss the various nuances of a philosophy of this nature and make a case for the security of a nation trumps all, but there was something unnerving about this mother's lesson.  Freedom of speech was not something communists in general enjoyed.  In fact, it was discouraged.  The state even went so far as to educate young children on how to recognize adult conversations they may have overheard involving any type of dissent or displeasure with the state.  What's worse, these children were instructed to report anything suspicious to the authorities, even if it meant turning in their own parents.
 
In Nazi Germany, Adolph Hitler used a slightly different method of dealing with dissent.  A corps of thugs was established to discourage any opposition to the fuhrer.  They were an early Nazi group called Sturmabteilung or SA.  AKA Brownshirts.  According to High Beam Encyclopedia, the SA "was led by a radical anti-capitalist, Ernst Rohm".  They were recruited from some of the rough neighborhoods where tough kids were used to violent physical confrontations.  Their background made them uniquely qualified for the task at hand.  That task was to disrupt, intimidate and drive off anyone who dare speak in opposition to Hitler.  It worked too.  The SA was directly responsible for Hitler's rise to become one of the worst mass murderers in history.
 
Under both of the aforementioned studies, millions and millions of human beings were held in slavery to the state.  Anyone daring to oppose the status quo was incarcerated, murdered, gassed, incinerated or suffered other forms of unspeakable abuse by the ruling class.  They were held in contept and extreme poverty, if allowed to live at all.
 
Its been said: "Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it".  That truth has never held more meaning than it does today. 
 
The President Elect, Barack Obama recently called for the establishment of a new government program that should scare the daylights out of free thinking Americans.  He said: "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded."
 
Ask yourself the following.  What type of characters might be drawn to this new army of stormtroopers and what exactly will be their mission? With complaints of how a half dozen thugs in ACLU jackets showed up at one polling place to intimidate voters, we should be aware of the limitless possibilities for abuse under an Obama administration and how the mission could creep into areas that may potentially shred our Bill Of Rights. 
 
If the GOP is smart, and its hard to tell sometimes, they will go to the mat opposing this one.  Memo them:  Don't get suckered into falling for this.  Our grandchildren will thank you one day.
 
P.S.  Thanks mom, for the lesson on oppression.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Republican Post Mortem?

Was Jeremiah Wright's comment prophetic when he said "God D*** America"?  Time will tell.
 
Pundits and experts across the country have been calling this race a referendum on Barack Obama.  It turned out to be a referendum on George Bush.
 
Polsters had this race really tight going into November 4th.  Obama swept McCain away capturing twice as many electoral votes.
 
Obama's acceptance speech was well written and eloquently delivered.  Will he deliver on his promises?
 
There has been an undercurrent of fears that Obama will lead this country in a direction that will further the cause of socialist ideas.  I, myself have commented on this many times and I believe it is true.  It troubles me to see the numbers of young people who embrace this philosophy out of ignorance.  They are the product of an education system that long ago gave up teaching history in favor of Marxist ideology.  How can they know the millions of lives crushed by the weight of Marxism in all its forms?  What bothers me most is their rejection of the liberty bequeathed to them by those who fought for it and died for it.  It seems like such a waste.  On November 4th, 2008, we gave the enemy of democracy a seat at our table.  God help us.
 
In spite of all the sadness of the morning after, the basic principles of conservatism are still legitimate.  The reasons for the democratic rout of republicans are many - the economy, the war in Iraq and to some extent, because republicans abandoned their core principles.  They tried to be like democrats.  Memo to republican leadership: That doesn't work!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Day of Reconing

Today, the republic, established "under God", fights for it's very soul against the forces of evil and Obama who thinks life begins when he says so.  The office of president is above his pay grade.  Don't sit this one out.  Vote and pray.  Pray hard.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Reasons To Vote McCain/Palin

 
Nearly every socialist sympathizing country in Europe loves Obama.
ACORN loves Obama.
Rashid Khalidi loves Obama.
William Ayers loves Obama.
Bernardine Dorn loves Obama.
Michelle Obama loves Obama.
Achmadinijad loves Obama.
Fidel Castro loves Obama.
Hugo Chavez loves Obama.
Nearly all of the Hollywood elites love Obama.
Hamas loves Obama.
Al Qaeda loves Obama.
Hezbolah loves Obama.
The UN loves Obama.
The New York Yimes loves Obama.
 
Notice anythig?  There's a common thread to all those mentioned above.  A substantive argument can be made that each and every one falls into one category.  They hate America or have at the very least displayed malice or hostility toward our country.  If our enemies love the democratic candidate, why in God's name should we?  Obviously they all think they stand to gain something from an Obama presidency.  In order for them to gain, we have to lose.  A vote for Obama is a vote for the demise of our beloved nation.
 
That's reason enough for me to vote McCain/Palin.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Random Thoughts

An effigy of Sarah Palin hangs by the neck from the gable of a house in LA.  The owner of the house calls it "art".  As an artist, I am insulted that someone would consider it "art".  As a Christian, I am appalled that people don't see this "art" for what it really is - hate.
 
Helen Jones-Kelley, director of The Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, used government computers to investigate Samuel Wurzelbacher (Joe the Plumber).  Kelley-Jones is a democrat who has made the maximum allowable contributions to the Obama campaign.  She dismisses claims that her snooping was politically motivated.  Right.  Ask yourself this.  If there were any skeletons in Joe's closet, what do you think would have happened next?  This is just a preview of the the next four years of an Obama administration and how they will treat those with the audacity to challenge his policies.
 
Only a few days left to the most important election of our time.  Obama has raised upwards of three quarters of a billion dollars in campaign contributions.  He's outspent McCain on an average of five to one, ten to one in some markets.  He has celebrity status and the support of nearly all of Hollywood and the so called "global community".  Nearly all of the main stream media backs Obama including the major TV networks and most major newspapers across America.  The vast majority of commentary from these sources has been overwhelmingly positive for Obama and negative for McCain.  Obama spent millions purchasing thirty minutes of airtime to make his well orchistrated pitch to the undecideds.  He has ridden the wave of discontent through the pipeline of crashing markets and the relentless dischord among Bush haters everywhere.  Indeed, Obama has had every conceivable break go his way while McCain has run one of the most inept campaigns in recent memory.  And yet, its still close.  Latest polls indicate the race is within the margin of error.  Its impossible to predict the outcome of this one, but if I were Obama, I'd be concerned.
 
Reuters reports that a video has surfaced of an Al Qaeda leader praying for "the humiliation of Bush and his party".  Its no secret that terrorists everywhere want Obama to win this election.  Why do you suppose that is?  Those who refuse to see this threat for what it is think we can cuddle with them and have dialogue.  The only "dialogue" Jihadists want with you  is their edict that you convert to Islam.  If not, heads will roll.  An Obama win will confirm in their minds Allah's belssing on their mission.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Undecided. What?!

The presidential campaign has been going on for what, twelve years or so?  OK, not really, but it seems so.  Helllooooo.  If you're still undecided about who to vote for, it's safe to say you have no executive or leadership experience.  Perhaps you're paranoid.  Maybe you're looking for attention.  Either way, decision making is not something you're good at, so may I suggest you do your country a favor and just stay home next Tuesday? 
 
Thank you.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama National Bank

Thanks to the government interfering with the financial marketplace, American taxpayers are on the hook for bailing out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  Lending institutions were pressured by our government, under threat of facing discrimination charges, to lend money to those who could not possibly pay it back.  Millions of bad loans were written, the economy soured and now, all sorts of businesses are lining up for a handout.  What now?

Just how much is this seemingly endless bailout going to cost American taxpayers?  Some say it could be in the trillions.  And who is going to have the responsibility of overseeing the appropriation of all that cash?  The second question is even more important than the first, especially if Barack Obama becomes the next president.
 
A trillion dollars is one huge pile of loot.  Did I just say loot?  Sorry, but get used to the idea.  Obama has shown an incredible propensity for associating with people who have a track record of cooking the books and profiting handsomely for their efforts.  Two of these guys are Jim Johnson and Franklin Raines. 
 
A report by the Office of Housing Enterprise Oversight from September, 2004 found that  Fannie Mae had improperly deferred $200 million in expenses.  According to Wikipedia, "This enabled top executives, including Johnson and his successor Franklin Raines to receive substantial bonuses in  1998."  Johnson's take - $21 million.  Raines pulled in $20 million in 2003 alone. 
 
Johnson was named to Obama's VP search committee. He is a committed supporter of Obama having donated the maximum allowable to his campaign.  He reportedly stepped down when the investigation into his involvement the financial crisis became public. 
 
Raines was reported to have had some conversations with the Obama campaign regarding "general housing, economy issues."  Since this information came to light, both Raines and the Obama campaign have insisted that Raines has had no part in advising the candidate.  No surprise there, but I'm not buying it.
 
Given their extensive experience in shady bookkeeping and skimming more than a little cream off the top, Raines and Johnsin are uniquely qualified to oversee the dispensation of a trillion buck bailout.  Imagine how much money could just disappear from a pile that high.  True, there's no guarantee these two would make the short list, but can we afford totake the chance?  Not wise.  Not wise at all.
 
There are other things that we should keep in mind as well.  There are no requirements for the banks to loan the money out.  In fact, it appears they can do just about anything they want to with it.  They can give executives bonuses, acquire other banks, heck, they could possibly even invest in Obama futures. (political contributions).  Imagine, our taxes going to the Obama coffers. 
 
And what if banks do lend the money out as was intended?  Will an Obama administration require them to adopt more sensible lending practices?  Will low income people be shut out of the American dream by having to prove credit worthyness?  Don't bet on it.  The same factors that got us into this mess will still be in play going forward and that will lead to more problems requiring more government solutions, etc, etc.  You get the picture.  Once the feds get their sticky little fingers into the pie, it will be nearly impossible to get them out.
 
The financial crisis has become a perfect excuse to call for more government - the last thing our Founding Fathers intended.  No doubt they would be grieved to see their republic on its death bed as socialists herald in the birth of a nationalized banking system.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Market Mugging

America is under seige.  We're being attacked from all directions by those who are determined to destroy our capitalist system and liberty itself.  The Wall Street bailout was intended to shore up the financial world and stave off a recession, but the very act of assuming someone elses financial responsibility flies in the face of economic fundamentals and investors know it.
 
The profit motive is what drives our system.  Businesses are started by those with a vision and hope and a few bucks.  Most invest their lives and fortunes, however big or small,  into their brainchild believing they have something others will want.  But, what if others don't want whatever it is they're selling?  Chances are, the business will fail and the owner will lose his or her shirt in the process.  Entrepaneurs accept this possibility and yet, go forward anyway hoping to increase the value of their original investment.  Makes sense, right?  Why would you knowing enter into any venture where failure is virtually guaranteed?  Are you listening, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd and Barack Obama?
 
The capitalist system rewards risk with profit.  Indeed, risk is the sole justification for profit, so it is correct to say that if you don't take on risk, don't expect a profit.  The conundrum of this bailout is that it nullifies risk.  Taking this to the extreme, no one would deserve a profit under the fundamental nature of this bailout.  This remedy might  also be setting a precedent that could be used to justify any and all future government intrusion into the private sector.  In other words, the private sector could ultimately cease to exist.  Socialists hate profit, unless its theirs.
 
The bad news is, with government "investment" comes government regulations.  Many details of the regulations and a plan for the withdrawal of government control are yet to be determined or digested.  There are questions about what lending institutions will do with the money.  Add to this whatever remedial uncertainties of the global marketplace and you have a recipe that virtually guarantees the financial cake will fall.  The good news is, ummm, I'll have to get back to you on that.
 
Now, in the weeks since the bailout passed, global markets have tumbled into a chasm and no one can prdict what each new day will bring. The radical fluctuations indicate that investors don't trust the government's meddling in the marketplace.  There's a new fear unlike anything we've seen here before.  It's the fear that the powers that be will begin to dictate the outcome of investments and that is not good.  If the government is willing to tinker with risk, it unavoidably effects profits as well.  It isn't rocket science.  I couldn't build a rocket, but I know a number of congressmen who deserve a ride on one.
 
All this nervous energy is causing investors to be very skittish.  Politicians, seizing every opportunity to capitalize on the current financial crisis, dish up ever evolving solutions to the latest dip in the market.  Did it ever occur to these geniuses that their kneejerk reactions might be exascerbating the problem?  When Fed Chairmen have to choose every word with extreme caution, its not hard to imagine what radical political rhetoric from the presidential candidates is doing to investor confidence.  How can investors feel comfortable sinking money into a game where the goal line is constantly moving?  They know this is like packing a couple of suitcases with Ben Franklins for a trip down a dark alley inhabited by crack addicts.
 
Every day brings a new crisis that candidates say can only be fixed with billions of our dollars, but I think it might be time for them to just shut up about it.  They probably won't though.  What a blow it would be to their self esteem if the market recovered without their help.  Then we'd all know how useless they really are. Can't risk that.  Better they fleece the American taxpayer for a few trillion bucks.
 
In addition to the aforementioned concerns, I believe the marketplace is very worried about what changes will come with an Obama presidency and that is at least part of the uneasyness investors are feeling right now.  I predict the markets will either soar or crash and burn depending on voters' choice on November 4th.  WIll capitalism win the day, or are our worst days still ahead?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Change

 
 
It's been said: "The more things change, the more they stay the same".  If that old axiom were true, then wouldn't the pinnacle of change be the same as..........................no change at all?
 
 
 
 
 
Tags: change  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obamarx

Barack Obama's thugs are engaged in an attempt to destroy Joe the plumber.  Joe had the audacity to ask Barack Obama why he wanted to raise our taxes.  To which, Obama replied that he thinks "spreading the wealth around is good for everybody."  Republicans have tried to present Obama's statement as a red flag revealing his true leanings - socialist.
 
The democrat hit machine has since been busy smearing Joe by reporting that he doesn't have a plumber's license and owes $1,182 in back taxes, as if any of that matters. They're attempting to shift the focus of dim-witted Americans to the source of the question and away from the question itself and especially Obama's answer.
 
The only relevant substance of the exchange between Joe the plumber and Barack Obama is Obama's response to Joe's question.  He wants to spread the wealth around.  Uh huh, so did Marx, Lenin and Stalin.  Yes, one can argue that Barack Obama may only be an ultra liberal, but don't let that fool you.  Vladimir Lenin once said: "The goal of socialism is communism."  If that's true, which it is, then the goal of liberalism is socialism.  That is the only logical progression from here.
 
That is the trail Obama will hack through the pristine forest of our American liberties and it should be clear to everyone his Marxist 
machine will crush anyone who stands in their way.  This must be what Obama really means when he talks of being a uniter - compliance via extortion.
 
The change may not be dramatic at first.  A shift of this magnitude may take a few election cycles or decades or even a few generations.  But one day, our posterity will wake up to the cold and hopeless reality of life in slavery to the state.  And it will happen because millions of voters today don't have the brains to see it coming or the courage to resist.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Playing Dirty a Character Issue

The Democratic Presidential Candidate speaks of lofty goals with a silver tongue.  The candidate comes across as a noble statesman embracing only the highest standards of ethical conduct.  The truth may be somewhat different if we consider what type of characters are attracted to him, and why.  We all know politics is a dirty game, but this crowd has redefined the term.
 
ACORN is under investigation for voter fraud in thirteen states.  Acorn activists have knowingly and deliberately engaged in submitting names and addresses for phony "voters".  It's important to note that this isn't simply a matter of stuffing ballot boxes.  This is personal.  Every time a bogus vote is cast for one candidate, it cancels that of someone who favors the other candidate.  These actions are effectively stealing the voices of  who knows how many Americans.  Maybe you're one of them.
 
There have been a number of filthy attacks on Republican Sarah Palin that the media has chosen to ignore.  Some of the stuff going on is as vulgar as you can imagine.  Michelle Malkin describes some of it in her latest blog.  Obama protesters have shown up at rallies wearnig t-shirts with: "Sarah Palin is a (insert c-word here)."  According to Malkin, one man showed up at a rally holding a toy gun to the head of a cardboard image of Palin.  There have been other reports of hecklers in the crowd yelling: "Stone her!"
 
Madonna's hatred for Palin has been revealed in such a filthy manner at concerts lately, its led to some speculation that she can rotate her head three hundred and sixty degrees and vomit a fowl green substance while singing "Like a Virgin". 
 
There have been a number of attacks of vandalism on republican headquarters and a McCain rally in New York was met with vulgar resistance from Obama supporters displaying their IQ with a single digit salute. 
 
None of this is newsworthy to the mainstream media.  Why not?  If republicans behaved the same way, you can bet it would make the front page of the New York Times and hundreds of articles would be published about those hate filled conservatives.  We all know the media is in the tank for Obama and they overlook the antics of those who hate Palin and McCain and anything decent. 
 
The left hates anyone with a good moral compas who has the ability to descern right from wrong.  Any candidate who embodies the essence of decency is a threat to their lifestyle.  This is about the battle between good and evil and the central issue on the side of evil is abortion.  By being a pro-life candidate, Sarah Palin has drawn the fateful lightning of the godless.
 
There are reports of the Obama campaign receiving illegal contributions from foreign sources.  Evidence of cash from donors from Middle Eastern countries was found in audits by the FEC.  Now, why would they be interested in an Obama presidency?
 
Rush Limbaugh reported on 10/15/08 a story about a Kansas City couple who discovered a suspicious charge on their credit card.  They called the card company and learned their account had been charged a $2300 donation to the Obama campaign.  The problem is, this McCain couple never made the donation and the card company had no answers as to how the charge got there in the first place.  The charge was eventually removed, but the rest of us might want to check our own statements.
 
Obama has a lengthy track record of associating with some unsavory characters like William Ayers and felons like Tony Rezco.  He also sought the advice of Franklin Raines and Jim Johnson, two of the people who profited millions while overseeing the fraudulent bookkeeping practices going on at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. 
 
A group of young Dutch socialists recently arrived here to join the campaign for Obama.  Why would they be interested in an Obama presidency?
 
Circumstantial evidence is considered legitimate reason to convict if a substantial amount of it points to the same conclusion.  We can debate infinitely whether the democratic presidential candidate is fit for duty, but there is a question that we should all consider.  There are far too many unsavory characters lining up in support of Barack Obama.  Laura Ingraham wants to know: "What is it about Barack Obama that these people are attracted to?"
 
There's an old saying of English origin dating to the 16th century that may still be worth considering in this modern era of lying, cheating and stealing.   "Birds of a feather flock together." 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive