About Me

Name: John Crutchfield
Email: p.crutchfield@comcast.net Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Cards v Stealers / Rant of a Patriot (fan)

Favored by six and a half going in
the Stealers' appeal had grown a bit thin.
Another world title would increase their lead 
over the Pats and the rest of league.
But what of the Cards, who were favored to lose
and who had the right of which team to chose?
To favor the Stealers, in my estimation,
made Cardinals victims of discrimination.
Surely Obama had made clear his preference
and Rooney thanked him in a post game reference.
To Obama, provider of Super Bowl rings
and hope and change and other great things,
all honor and glory for win number six.
Hail to the President; in was the fix!
Conspicuous yet was the absence of praise
from either QB, some eyebrows they raised.
Devout Christian soldiers were mute in the light
of Jesus, His Kingdom and blessings that night.
Perhaps the league had rewritten the creed;
Offend not the Muslims, in thought, word or deed.
Instead, Obama was given the credit
for victory simply because he had said it.
And what can you say of the organization?
Greed now a hallmark of Pittsburgh nation.
Why did they need another world title
while those who went hungry were near suicidal?
The halftime show had featured the Boss,
who surely endorsed a Cardinal loss.
It seemed the whole thing was rigged from the start
as setbacks officials were deigned to impart.
Yellow flags flew from the Pittsburgh types
posing as refs in black and white stripes.
Victims of prejudice should be excused
from aleged infractions of gridiron rules.
Those personal fowls were simply expedient
acts of civil disobedience.
The underdogs, who'd found favor with us,
were only the latest thrown under the bus.
Poor victim status, no matter how great,
means nothing compared with the needs of the state.
Alas, Arizona could never achieve
true victim status as many believe
the priorities there are all out of whack
and, like Kurt Warner, need to be sacked.
For what do the Cardinals represent,
Catholic heirarchy many resent
or legions of seniors out having fun
in pools and on golf courses drenched in sun?
The working man's heritage, heart of the Stealers
was served up to stimulate under achievers.
Blue collar workers were called to unite
against the well to do now in their sights. 
Arizona showcased the capitalist trend
that like McCain's run must come to an end
according to new international views.
The Super Bowl served to bring us the news.
This game was a lesson on wealth's upward trickle;
for the steel man a hammer, the farmer a sickle.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Random Thoughts

Joe Biden warned us the new president would be tested soon after being sworn in.  Joe must be a visionary.  With less than two weeks to go, Obama must be wondering why he wanted this job in the first place.  The way these problems are building up, he's going to have piles.
 
Lebanon has shown it's sympathy for Hamas and is now firing rockets into Israel.  With Israel engaged in battles on two fronts, one question comes to mind.  Will Israel be allowed to finish the job and how much will it cost US?  OK, that's two questions.
 
Its unclear where the "peace in the Middle East funds" will come from since we're already facing a $1.2 trillion deficit.  Maybe China could float us another loan.
 
Barack Obama ran on a platform of change, but since winning the election, he's surrounded himself with leftovers from the Clinton era with one notable exception - the big dog himself, Bill.  What will he do - Ambassador to China?
 
Actually, there are other disenfranchised Clintonistas waiting for jobs.  Surely they can find a spot for Sandy Burglar.  Library trustee perhaps?
 
And you can't tell me there aren't any radical religious groups left to wipe out.  Just where is Janet Reno when we need her?
 
Madeleine Albright once claimed she could leg press four hundred pounds.  "Laying the groundwork for lasting peace in the Middle East" will do that.
 
Does this mean Ron Brown and Vince Foster will be reunited with some of their old friends?
 
Too bad Algore is busy.
 
Obama promised to bring the troops home from Iraq.  Big whoop!  He's got four years to make good on that one.
 
At least the war on illegal immigration has been resolved.  In case you didn't notice, we surrendered.
 
From Fox News, "Obama Warns Recession May Linger For Years".  Increasing the national debt by a gazillion bucks should pretty much guarantee it, don't you think?
 
Where's my bailout check?
 
Iran wants nukes.  America is at the mercy of OPEC.  Individual wealth resources are evaporating before our eyes along with our national treasure.  Muslim radicals have stepped up efforts to murder as many Christians as possible in third world countries.  Terror cells have been established on our soil.  China is moving toward capitalism and America is moving toward socialism.  Seventy two virgins are still waiting for bin Laden.  Kim Jong Ill wants to kill everyone.
 
Aaahh, the Cold War Era.  Those were the good old days.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (11) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Blago The Bouffant Guber

In the spirit of the season, I offer the following - a revised edition of Rudolph sung by my dear old grandpappy, Burl Crutchfield...... OK, here we go!
 
 
You know Daschle, Emmanuel, Volcker and Clinton.
That's not exactly the change we envisioned.
But do you recall one who won't be making the ball?
 
Blago the bouffant guber, had a senate seat for sale
and when the feds learned of it, he was facing time in jail.
 
All of the other suspects hoped they wouldn't hear their names
on the taped conversations Pat Fitzgerald had obtained.
 
Then one sorry autumn eve, lawmen came to say:
"Sing us a sweet song tonight, or you'll go away."
 
Then how Barack disowned him, worried he might cop a plea.
Blago the bouffant guber, treacherous is his story.
Trea cher ous is his sto ry.
 
 
Thank you.  Thank you very much.  =)
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (10) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

USSA

Back in the late nineteen fifties, a mother attempted to explain how precious our freedom is and how blessed we are to enjoy the right of free speech.  To help illustrate her point, she described a little bit about what life was like under communism.  She told of the basic characteristics of communism and added in a little bit of something her son found nearly unbelieveable.  She described how children raised in communism were taught to be loyal to the state exclusively.  They were taught to hold the state in higher regard than anything else, even their families.
 
We can discuss the various nuances of a philosophy of this nature and make a case for the security of a nation trumps all, but there was something unnerving about this mother's lesson.  Freedom of speech was not something communists in general enjoyed.  In fact, it was discouraged.  The state even went so far as to educate young children on how to recognize adult conversations they may have overheard involving any type of dissent or displeasure with the state.  What's worse, these children were instructed to report anything suspicious to the authorities, even if it meant turning in their own parents.
 
In Nazi Germany, Adolph Hitler used a slightly different method of dealing with dissent.  A corps of thugs was established to discourage any opposition to the fuhrer.  They were an early Nazi group called Sturmabteilung or SA.  AKA Brownshirts.  According to High Beam Encyclopedia, the SA "was led by a radical anti-capitalist, Ernst Rohm".  They were recruited from some of the rough neighborhoods where tough kids were used to violent physical confrontations.  Their background made them uniquely qualified for the task at hand.  That task was to disrupt, intimidate and drive off anyone who dare speak in opposition to Hitler.  It worked too.  The SA was directly responsible for Hitler's rise to become one of the worst mass murderers in history.
 
Under both of the aforementioned studies, millions and millions of human beings were held in slavery to the state.  Anyone daring to oppose the status quo was incarcerated, murdered, gassed, incinerated or suffered other forms of unspeakable abuse by the ruling class.  They were held in contept and extreme poverty, if allowed to live at all.
 
Its been said: "Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it".  That truth has never held more meaning than it does today. 
 
The President Elect, Barack Obama recently called for the establishment of a new government program that should scare the daylights out of free thinking Americans.  He said: "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded."
 
Ask yourself the following.  What type of characters might be drawn to this new army of stormtroopers and what exactly will be their mission? With complaints of how a half dozen thugs in ACLU jackets showed up at one polling place to intimidate voters, we should be aware of the limitless possibilities for abuse under an Obama administration and how the mission could creep into areas that may potentially shred our Bill Of Rights. 
 
If the GOP is smart, and its hard to tell sometimes, they will go to the mat opposing this one.  Memo them:  Don't get suckered into falling for this.  Our grandchildren will thank you one day.
 
P.S.  Thanks mom, for the lesson on oppression.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Republican Post Mortem?

Was Jeremiah Wright's comment prophetic when he said "God D*** America"?  Time will tell.
 
Pundits and experts across the country have been calling this race a referendum on Barack Obama.  It turned out to be a referendum on George Bush.
 
Polsters had this race really tight going into November 4th.  Obama swept McCain away capturing twice as many electoral votes.
 
Obama's acceptance speech was well written and eloquently delivered.  Will he deliver on his promises?
 
There has been an undercurrent of fears that Obama will lead this country in a direction that will further the cause of socialist ideas.  I, myself have commented on this many times and I believe it is true.  It troubles me to see the numbers of young people who embrace this philosophy out of ignorance.  They are the product of an education system that long ago gave up teaching history in favor of Marxist ideology.  How can they know the millions of lives crushed by the weight of Marxism in all its forms?  What bothers me most is their rejection of the liberty bequeathed to them by those who fought for it and died for it.  It seems like such a waste.  On November 4th, 2008, we gave the enemy of democracy a seat at our table.  God help us.
 
In spite of all the sadness of the morning after, the basic principles of conservatism are still legitimate.  The reasons for the democratic rout of republicans are many - the economy, the war in Iraq and to some extent, because republicans abandoned their core principles.  They tried to be like democrats.  Memo to republican leadership: That doesn't work!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Day of Reconing

Today, the republic, established "under God", fights for it's very soul against the forces of evil and Obama who thinks life begins when he says so.  The office of president is above his pay grade.  Don't sit this one out.  Vote and pray.  Pray hard.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Reasons To Vote McCain/Palin

 
Nearly every socialist sympathizing country in Europe loves Obama.
ACORN loves Obama.
Rashid Khalidi loves Obama.
William Ayers loves Obama.
Bernardine Dorn loves Obama.
Michelle Obama loves Obama.
Achmadinijad loves Obama.
Fidel Castro loves Obama.
Hugo Chavez loves Obama.
Nearly all of the Hollywood elites love Obama.
Hamas loves Obama.
Al Qaeda loves Obama.
Hezbolah loves Obama.
The UN loves Obama.
The New York Yimes loves Obama.
 
Notice anythig?  There's a common thread to all those mentioned above.  A substantive argument can be made that each and every one falls into one category.  They hate America or have at the very least displayed malice or hostility toward our country.  If our enemies love the democratic candidate, why in God's name should we?  Obviously they all think they stand to gain something from an Obama presidency.  In order for them to gain, we have to lose.  A vote for Obama is a vote for the demise of our beloved nation.
 
That's reason enough for me to vote McCain/Palin.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Random Thoughts

An effigy of Sarah Palin hangs by the neck from the gable of a house in LA.  The owner of the house calls it "art".  As an artist, I am insulted that someone would consider it "art".  As a Christian, I am appalled that people don't see this "art" for what it really is - hate.
 
Helen Jones-Kelley, director of The Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, used government computers to investigate Samuel Wurzelbacher (Joe the Plumber).  Kelley-Jones is a democrat who has made the maximum allowable contributions to the Obama campaign.  She dismisses claims that her snooping was politically motivated.  Right.  Ask yourself this.  If there were any skeletons in Joe's closet, what do you think would have happened next?  This is just a preview of the the next four years of an Obama administration and how they will treat those with the audacity to challenge his policies.
 
Only a few days left to the most important election of our time.  Obama has raised upwards of three quarters of a billion dollars in campaign contributions.  He's outspent McCain on an average of five to one, ten to one in some markets.  He has celebrity status and the support of nearly all of Hollywood and the so called "global community".  Nearly all of the main stream media backs Obama including the major TV networks and most major newspapers across America.  The vast majority of commentary from these sources has been overwhelmingly positive for Obama and negative for McCain.  Obama spent millions purchasing thirty minutes of airtime to make his well orchistrated pitch to the undecideds.  He has ridden the wave of discontent through the pipeline of crashing markets and the relentless dischord among Bush haters everywhere.  Indeed, Obama has had every conceivable break go his way while McCain has run one of the most inept campaigns in recent memory.  And yet, its still close.  Latest polls indicate the race is within the margin of error.  Its impossible to predict the outcome of this one, but if I were Obama, I'd be concerned.
 
Reuters reports that a video has surfaced of an Al Qaeda leader praying for "the humiliation of Bush and his party".  Its no secret that terrorists everywhere want Obama to win this election.  Why do you suppose that is?  Those who refuse to see this threat for what it is think we can cuddle with them and have dialogue.  The only "dialogue" Jihadists want with you  is their edict that you convert to Islam.  If not, heads will roll.  An Obama win will confirm in their minds Allah's belssing on their mission.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama National Bank

Thanks to the government interfering with the financial marketplace, American taxpayers are on the hook for bailing out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  Lending institutions were pressured by our government, under threat of facing discrimination charges, to lend money to those who could not possibly pay it back.  Millions of bad loans were written, the economy soured and now, all sorts of businesses are lining up for a handout.  What now?

Just how much is this seemingly endless bailout going to cost American taxpayers?  Some say it could be in the trillions.  And who is going to have the responsibility of overseeing the appropriation of all that cash?  The second question is even more important than the first, especially if Barack Obama becomes the next president.
 
A trillion dollars is one huge pile of loot.  Did I just say loot?  Sorry, but get used to the idea.  Obama has shown an incredible propensity for associating with people who have a track record of cooking the books and profiting handsomely for their efforts.  Two of these guys are Jim Johnson and Franklin Raines. 
 
A report by the Office of Housing Enterprise Oversight from September, 2004 found that  Fannie Mae had improperly deferred $200 million in expenses.  According to Wikipedia, "This enabled top executives, including Johnson and his successor Franklin Raines to receive substantial bonuses in  1998."  Johnson's take - $21 million.  Raines pulled in $20 million in 2003 alone. 
 
Johnson was named to Obama's VP search committee. He is a committed supporter of Obama having donated the maximum allowable to his campaign.  He reportedly stepped down when the investigation into his involvement the financial crisis became public. 
 
Raines was reported to have had some conversations with the Obama campaign regarding "general housing, economy issues."  Since this information came to light, both Raines and the Obama campaign have insisted that Raines has had no part in advising the candidate.  No surprise there, but I'm not buying it.
 
Given their extensive experience in shady bookkeeping and skimming more than a little cream off the top, Raines and Johnsin are uniquely qualified to oversee the dispensation of a trillion buck bailout.  Imagine how much money could just disappear from a pile that high.  True, there's no guarantee these two would make the short list, but can we afford totake the chance?  Not wise.  Not wise at all.
 
There are other things that we should keep in mind as well.  There are no requirements for the banks to loan the money out.  In fact, it appears they can do just about anything they want to with it.  They can give executives bonuses, acquire other banks, heck, they could possibly even invest in Obama futures. (political contributions).  Imagine, our taxes going to the Obama coffers. 
 
And what if banks do lend the money out as was intended?  Will an Obama administration require them to adopt more sensible lending practices?  Will low income people be shut out of the American dream by having to prove credit worthyness?  Don't bet on it.  The same factors that got us into this mess will still be in play going forward and that will lead to more problems requiring more government solutions, etc, etc.  You get the picture.  Once the feds get their sticky little fingers into the pie, it will be nearly impossible to get them out.
 
The financial crisis has become a perfect excuse to call for more government - the last thing our Founding Fathers intended.  No doubt they would be grieved to see their republic on its death bed as socialists herald in the birth of a nationalized banking system.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Market Mugging

America is under seige.  We're being attacked from all directions by those who are determined to destroy our capitalist system and liberty itself.  The Wall Street bailout was intended to shore up the financial world and stave off a recession, but the very act of assuming someone elses financial responsibility flies in the face of economic fundamentals and investors know it.
 
The profit motive is what drives our system.  Businesses are started by those with a vision and hope and a few bucks.  Most invest their lives and fortunes, however big or small,  into their brainchild believing they have something others will want.  But, what if others don't want whatever it is they're selling?  Chances are, the business will fail and the owner will lose his or her shirt in the process.  Entrepaneurs accept this possibility and yet, go forward anyway hoping to increase the value of their original investment.  Makes sense, right?  Why would you knowing enter into any venture where failure is virtually guaranteed?  Are you listening, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd and Barack Obama?
 
The capitalist system rewards risk with profit.  Indeed, risk is the sole justification for profit, so it is correct to say that if you don't take on risk, don't expect a profit.  The conundrum of this bailout is that it nullifies risk.  Taking this to the extreme, no one would deserve a profit under the fundamental nature of this bailout.  This remedy might  also be setting a precedent that could be used to justify any and all future government intrusion into the private sector.  In other words, the private sector could ultimately cease to exist.  Socialists hate profit, unless its theirs.
 
The bad news is, with government "investment" comes government regulations.  Many details of the regulations and a plan for the withdrawal of government control are yet to be determined or digested.  There are questions about what lending institutions will do with the money.  Add to this whatever remedial uncertainties of the global marketplace and you have a recipe that virtually guarantees the financial cake will fall.  The good news is, ummm, I'll have to get back to you on that.
 
Now, in the weeks since the bailout passed, global markets have tumbled into a chasm and no one can prdict what each new day will bring. The radical fluctuations indicate that investors don't trust the government's meddling in the marketplace.  There's a new fear unlike anything we've seen here before.  It's the fear that the powers that be will begin to dictate the outcome of investments and that is not good.  If the government is willing to tinker with risk, it unavoidably effects profits as well.  It isn't rocket science.  I couldn't build a rocket, but I know a number of congressmen who deserve a ride on one.
 
All this nervous energy is causing investors to be very skittish.  Politicians, seizing every opportunity to capitalize on the current financial crisis, dish up ever evolving solutions to the latest dip in the market.  Did it ever occur to these geniuses that their kneejerk reactions might be exascerbating the problem?  When Fed Chairmen have to choose every word with extreme caution, its not hard to imagine what radical political rhetoric from the presidential candidates is doing to investor confidence.  How can investors feel comfortable sinking money into a game where the goal line is constantly moving?  They know this is like packing a couple of suitcases with Ben Franklins for a trip down a dark alley inhabited by crack addicts.
 
Every day brings a new crisis that candidates say can only be fixed with billions of our dollars, but I think it might be time for them to just shut up about it.  They probably won't though.  What a blow it would be to their self esteem if the market recovered without their help.  Then we'd all know how useless they really are. Can't risk that.  Better they fleece the American taxpayer for a few trillion bucks.
 
In addition to the aforementioned concerns, I believe the marketplace is very worried about what changes will come with an Obama presidency and that is at least part of the uneasyness investors are feeling right now.  I predict the markets will either soar or crash and burn depending on voters' choice on November 4th.  WIll capitalism win the day, or are our worst days still ahead?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obamarx

Barack Obama's thugs are engaged in an attempt to destroy Joe the plumber.  Joe had the audacity to ask Barack Obama why he wanted to raise our taxes.  To which, Obama replied that he thinks "spreading the wealth around is good for everybody."  Republicans have tried to present Obama's statement as a red flag revealing his true leanings - socialist.
 
The democrat hit machine has since been busy smearing Joe by reporting that he doesn't have a plumber's license and owes $1,182 in back taxes, as if any of that matters. They're attempting to shift the focus of dim-witted Americans to the source of the question and away from the question itself and especially Obama's answer.
 
The only relevant substance of the exchange between Joe the plumber and Barack Obama is Obama's response to Joe's question.  He wants to spread the wealth around.  Uh huh, so did Marx, Lenin and Stalin.  Yes, one can argue that Barack Obama may only be an ultra liberal, but don't let that fool you.  Vladimir Lenin once said: "The goal of socialism is communism."  If that's true, which it is, then the goal of liberalism is socialism.  That is the only logical progression from here.
 
That is the trail Obama will hack through the pristine forest of our American liberties and it should be clear to everyone his Marxist 
machine will crush anyone who stands in their way.  This must be what Obama really means when he talks of being a uniter - compliance via extortion.
 
The change may not be dramatic at first.  A shift of this magnitude may take a few election cycles or decades or even a few generations.  But one day, our posterity will wake up to the cold and hopeless reality of life in slavery to the state.  And it will happen because millions of voters today don't have the brains to see it coming or the courage to resist.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Playing Dirty a Character Issue

The Democratic Presidential Candidate speaks of lofty goals with a silver tongue.  The candidate comes across as a noble statesman embracing only the highest standards of ethical conduct.  The truth may be somewhat different if we consider what type of characters are attracted to him, and why.  We all know politics is a dirty game, but this crowd has redefined the term.
 
ACORN is under investigation for voter fraud in thirteen states.  Acorn activists have knowingly and deliberately engaged in submitting names and addresses for phony "voters".  It's important to note that this isn't simply a matter of stuffing ballot boxes.  This is personal.  Every time a bogus vote is cast for one candidate, it cancels that of someone who favors the other candidate.  These actions are effectively stealing the voices of  who knows how many Americans.  Maybe you're one of them.
 
There have been a number of filthy attacks on Republican Sarah Palin that the media has chosen to ignore.  Some of the stuff going on is as vulgar as you can imagine.  Michelle Malkin describes some of it in her latest blog.  Obama protesters have shown up at rallies wearnig t-shirts with: "Sarah Palin is a (insert c-word here)."  According to Malkin, one man showed up at a rally holding a toy gun to the head of a cardboard image of Palin.  There have been other reports of hecklers in the crowd yelling: "Stone her!"
 
Madonna's hatred for Palin has been revealed in such a filthy manner at concerts lately, its led to some speculation that she can rotate her head three hundred and sixty degrees and vomit a fowl green substance while singing "Like a Virgin". 
 
There have been a number of attacks of vandalism on republican headquarters and a McCain rally in New York was met with vulgar resistance from Obama supporters displaying their IQ with a single digit salute. 
 
None of this is newsworthy to the mainstream media.  Why not?  If republicans behaved the same way, you can bet it would make the front page of the New York Times and hundreds of articles would be published about those hate filled conservatives.  We all know the media is in the tank for Obama and they overlook the antics of those who hate Palin and McCain and anything decent. 
 
The left hates anyone with a good moral compas who has the ability to descern right from wrong.  Any candidate who embodies the essence of decency is a threat to their lifestyle.  This is about the battle between good and evil and the central issue on the side of evil is abortion.  By being a pro-life candidate, Sarah Palin has drawn the fateful lightning of the godless.
 
There are reports of the Obama campaign receiving illegal contributions from foreign sources.  Evidence of cash from donors from Middle Eastern countries was found in audits by the FEC.  Now, why would they be interested in an Obama presidency?
 
Rush Limbaugh reported on 10/15/08 a story about a Kansas City couple who discovered a suspicious charge on their credit card.  They called the card company and learned their account had been charged a $2300 donation to the Obama campaign.  The problem is, this McCain couple never made the donation and the card company had no answers as to how the charge got there in the first place.  The charge was eventually removed, but the rest of us might want to check our own statements.
 
Obama has a lengthy track record of associating with some unsavory characters like William Ayers and felons like Tony Rezco.  He also sought the advice of Franklin Raines and Jim Johnson, two of the people who profited millions while overseeing the fraudulent bookkeeping practices going on at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. 
 
A group of young Dutch socialists recently arrived here to join the campaign for Obama.  Why would they be interested in an Obama presidency?
 
Circumstantial evidence is considered legitimate reason to convict if a substantial amount of it points to the same conclusion.  We can debate infinitely whether the democratic presidential candidate is fit for duty, but there is a question that we should all consider.  There are far too many unsavory characters lining up in support of Barack Obama.  Laura Ingraham wants to know: "What is it about Barack Obama that these people are attracted to?"
 
There's an old saying of English origin dating to the 16th century that may still be worth considering in this modern era of lying, cheating and stealing.   "Birds of a feather flock together." 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Most Important Election of Our Time

PLease check out the article by Shawn Akers on Townhall.com titled "Obama's Henchmen and the Rise of Commufacism"
10/9/2008
 
There's a huge segment of the population who don't even see this coming.  Scarier still, millions do but embrace it anyway.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Futures Draw Overseas Investors

Laura Inghraham reported that someone in the Federal Election Commission is calling for an investigation into Obama's campaign contributions claiming that up to $200m may be from illegal sources, much of it from foreigh sources.  The unnamed auditor claims to have found more than enough evidence of impropriety and has tried on four different occasions to get the Justice Department and FBI to begin an investigation.  So far, the feds have refused to act because any investigation of this type "would appear as a crimial investigation and could have some effect on the outcome of the election".  No kidding.  Do you think $200 million illegal dollars might effect the outcome of the election?
 
If similar questions were raised about the McCain campaign, do you think democrats would be howling for an investigation?  You bet!  Now, the GOP has finally filed an official complaint against the Obama campaign with the FEC claiming they are in violation of federal election laws by accepting donations that exceed legal limits for individuals and from foreign sources, some of which are likely to be enemies of this country.  But the republicans need to do more.  They need to weave this topic into every single conversation regarding Barack Obama. 
 
Pamela Geller has reported strong and frightening evidence of illegal campaign contributions to the Obama ticket.  This information is available at www.atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com   Note to the FBI: This is illegal and it is clearly documented!
 
In addition to receiving illegal campaign contributions, democrats in several states have been submitting phony voter registration documents.  They have forged the signatures of people on these documents, but they weren't smart enough to use different forgers. A large number of signatures were discovered to bear the same handwriting characteristics.  Try to imagine a small army of activists engaged in this fraudulent activity and you can see the potential for a stolen election.  If you're an American voter, ask yourself which one of those illegal votes cancelled yours?   The other question is: how much of this has gone undiscovered?
 
Obama moved his national campaign headquarters to Chicago where voter fraud is a foregone conclusion.  In fact, this entire election process has become a national joke.  Michelle Malkin has a great piece on this published on October 8th, 2008.  Between stuffing the ballot boxes, illegal campaign contributions and fraudulent voter registration, the democrats (socialists) are stealing our country.  This is nothing new, by the way.  Democrats with no ethics or conscience have been doing this stuff for decades.  And they want to run this country?!
 
There seems to be all kinds of underhanded and possibly even hugely criminal stuff taking place within the Obama campaign that the feds don't want to get involved with.  Think about that.  The grand theft of our country may be taking place right under our noses and those charged with protecting us don't want to get involved.  Amazing!  Even the issues that are being investigated may not yeild any results until after the damage has been done.
 
In addition to the sloth-like progress of the feds, the mainstream media has shown no interest in this at all.  They're too busy looking into real heavyweight issues, like whether or not Sarah Palin tried to get an abusive State Trooper fired. 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Nashville Nuthouse!

Huh?!  After suffering through the second presidential debate, I'm considering a visit to the psyche ward and demanding a full frontal lobotomy - that is if I can't coax Jack Kevorkian out of retirement.
 
"What don't you know and how will you learn it?"  That was the final question asked via the internet from someone in New Hampshire
who obviously did inhale.  How this question qualified for a national platform in a debate of such magnitude is a mystery to me.  Oh yeah, I forgot, Tom Brokaw decided which questions would be asked.  Once again, the GOP stepped into the trap of allowing the enemy to control the discussion.
 
As Forrest Gump would say: "Stupid is as stupid does."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »